This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bermuda Triangle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Archives:1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 31 days
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
Bermuda Triangle received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on September 2007 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
The Human Error section is very strange. It doesn't seem relevant or contribute anything useful to the article. The last sentence seems especially irrelevant. Am I missing something? DJ Craig (talk) 03:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The section title may be a bit misleading. It appears the point being made is that decision making by people (e.g. the ship captain who "sailed into the teeth of a storm") is a factor. I can review the cited sourcing and look to refine that section, in the next day or two. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I think this article should put a bit more emphasis on what most people's definition of the triangle's area would be if asked- I have seen Britannica's entry on it which does point out that it is fairly loosely-defined, but there are quite a few other sources that give what I (and likely most other people) think is probably the most agreed-upon area, some of those being NOAA (in their image) [1], Fox Weather [2], The Jerusalem Post [3], UC Santa Barbara (albeit loosely) [4], History.com (possibly not reliable) [5], National Geographic(loosely)[6], and the Richmond Times-Dispatch [7], just to name a couple. I thought I'd bring this up on the talk page before I make any edits because it's a fairly big change and it seems to me like something an edit war might be started over. I do believe I've found quite a few reliable sources here, enough to justify emphasizing the San Juan-Miami-Bermuda area more in the article (obviously while still pointing out that it's not universally agreed upon). Thanks!
This one has been litigated and edit-skirmished a couple times. I am requesting that the introductory sentence be changed to "The Bermuda Triangle, also known as the Devil's Triangle, is an urban legend of a loosely defined region between Florida, Bermuda, and Puerto Rico in the southwestern North Atlantic Ocean where a number of aircraft and ships have disappeared under mysterious circumstances." guninvalid (talk) 23:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support my own request. I feel that it is important that readers recognize that it is an urban legend from the outset, and it's mentioned in the article short desc. There's precedence around that particular language too: googling bermuda triangle "urban legend" shows 193 results. guninvalid (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need to add the term "urban legend" to the first sentence. The second sentence clearly indicates that there is nothing mysterious about the Bermuda Triangle. -- Guest2625 (talk) 03:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would be okay with putting it in the second sentence. My only gripe with the second sentence as written is that there is a difference between indicating that there is nothing mysterious about the Bermuda Triangle and indicating that reputable sources say that there is nothing mysterious about the Bermuda Triangle. But mostly I posted this RfC to get try to reach a consensus. guninvalid (talk) 06:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Crystal, bad RfC as there was no RfCBefore discussion. I'm removing the RfC template. Please discuss with the editors who disagree with you (and revert you) first. Aaron Liu (talk) 16:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]